Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Select two models to compare their coding performance, pricing, and features.
Key Takeaways
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3.8 Max 0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Coding Index | 111.92 | — Score awaiting verification |
| Coding tier | A+ | A+? Provisional · source review pending |
| Input Price | $0.75/1M | $2/1M |
| Output Price | $3.75/1M | $6/1M |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 = 100. The index reflects two shared tests, not capability multiples or statistically established gaps.
Verdict
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 has a provisional A+ tier pending original-source review, with no numeric rank or comparable index. A transcribed AA index is not independent verification.
Capabilities & Use Cases Comparison
Gemini 3.8 Flash Tier A+
- •Software engineering
- •Agentic workflows
- •Multimodal input
- •Improved software engineering and agentic capabilities
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Tier A+
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Benchmark evidence and ranking method · Gemini 3.8 Flash
Cross-checked
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · mini-SWE-agent · high: 19.09% · 95% CI ± 3.36%
Artificial Analysis · Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Test configuration: high
Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.64% · SciCode: 56.60%
LiveBench · 2026-06-25 · gemini-3.8-flash-high
Coding: 72.49% · Agentic Coding: 54.24%
ModelRank assigns editorial tiers using public coding evidence, not automatic index thresholds or statistically proven classes. Price, speed, context size and sponsorship do not affect tiers.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 = 100. The index reflects two shared tests, not capability multiples or statistically established gaps.
Results reflect particular model configurations. Agent harnesses, reasoning effort, tools, budgets and tasks may differ. Close indices do not establish superiority. B describes a relative position in this selected group, not an inability to code.
Data checked: 2026-09-10. Snapshot date is the retrieval date, not necessarily the evaluation date.
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Benchmark evidence and ranking method · Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Provisional · source review pending
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 has a provisional A+ tier pending original-source review, with no numeric rank or comparable index. A transcribed AA index is not independent verification.
OpenRouter · qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902 · AA Coding Index: 71.8
ModelRank assigns editorial tiers using public coding evidence, not automatic index thresholds or statistically proven classes. Price, speed, context size and sponsorship do not affect tiers.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 = 100. The index reflects two shared tests, not capability multiples or statistically established gaps.
Results reflect particular model configurations. Agent harnesses, reasoning effort, tools, budgets and tasks may differ. Close indices do not establish superiority. B describes a relative position in this selected group, not an inability to code.
Data checked: 2026-09-10. Snapshot date is the retrieval date, not necessarily the evaluation date.
Results reflect particular model configurations. Agent harnesses, reasoning effort, tools, budgets and tasks may differ. Close indices do not establish superiority. B describes a relative position in this selected group, not an inability to code.
API cost estimate
1M input + 200K output (USD):
Gemini 3.8 Flash: $1.5000
Qwen3.8 Max 0902: $3.2000
Estimates use the displayed channel and time band; DeepSeek uses peak rates. Cache discounts, tool fees, long-context price tiers and uncounted additional tokens are excluded.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which model is better for coding: Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?
A comparable reference index is unavailable for one or both models; no index-based winner is assigned. Editorial tiers: Gemini 3.8 Flash = A+; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 = A+ · Provisional · source review pending. Tiers are separate editorial assessments and do not establish a reliable order within a tier.
How do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 compare in API pricing and costs?
Gemini 3.8 Flash: $0.75/1M input, $3.75/1M output (OpenRouter quote); Qwen3.8 Max 0902: $2/1M input, $6/1M output (OpenRouter quote). 1M input + 200K output (USD): $1.5000 vs $3.2000.
What are the context window sizes of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max 0902?
Gemini 3.8 Flash provides a 1,048,576 token context window, while Qwen3.8 Max 0902 provides 1,000,000 tokens.